"You" cannot get out of
or into
What IS.
So, how can "you"
BE
an independent entity?
Saturday, August 28, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
what what?
When Nan-yueh visited his teacher
he was asked,
"what is it that has thus come?"
He could not respond,
and was plagued by the question
for years.
Finally it dawned on him,
"Even to say it is anything
doesn't hit the mark."
he was asked,
"what is it that has thus come?"
He could not respond,
and was plagued by the question
for years.
Finally it dawned on him,
"Even to say it is anything
doesn't hit the mark."
Wednesday, August 18, 2010
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
The Functioning of Totality
The belief that you
are the subject of any object
is mistaken;
it's a "false claim."
The quasi-subject
and quasi-object
"arise together."
are the subject of any object
is mistaken;
it's a "false claim."
The quasi-subject
and quasi-object
"arise together."
Tuesday, August 10, 2010
Monday, August 2, 2010
Noumenal Living by Wei Wu Wei
BEING (or living noumenally, subjectively) is not ceasing to objectivise (interpret)--- for that is the functional aspect of subject---but ceasing to objectivise oneself, and thereby ceasing to regard one's objects as independent entities, as other than an aspect of oneself as their subject.
That, of course, implies that one is profoundly aware that one is not at all as any conceptual object, even a 'being'.
That integral absence, both phenomenal and noumenal, is the necessary awareness of is-as-it-isness---commonly called Awakening.
That, of course, implies that one is profoundly aware that one is not at all as any conceptual object, even a 'being'.
That integral absence, both phenomenal and noumenal, is the necessary awareness of is-as-it-isness---commonly called Awakening.
interpretation
What does "separation" depend on? What makes perception "indirect"?
The answer, in a word, is interpretation.
Consider that a newborn also receives "sensory data" BUT has not yet learned how to interpret "what it signifies."
The answer, in a word, is interpretation.
Consider that a newborn also receives "sensory data" BUT has not yet learned how to interpret "what it signifies."
Saturday, July 31, 2010
There is only "perceiving."
Freedom from suffering simply means not being identified anymore, which means not being separate anymore. We only suffer when we're identified, and we're only identified when we're separate.
When we perceive directly, there is no separation. There is only perceiving.
---Jon Bernie
When we perceive directly, there is no separation. There is only perceiving.
---Jon Bernie
no Wayne (or Fred) separate from the Whole
Q: Is Wayne, with a body-mind mechanism, aware that he is not the doer?
A: There is no longer a Wayne WITH a body-mind mechanism. There is only the body-mind mechanism with the name Wayne. There is no separate Wayne there to be aware that he (is or) is not the doer, or that the sense of personal doership is gone. The whole issue is gone. There is simply doing.
---Wayne Liquorman
A: There is no longer a Wayne WITH a body-mind mechanism. There is only the body-mind mechanism with the name Wayne. There is no separate Wayne there to be aware that he (is or) is not the doer, or that the sense of personal doership is gone. The whole issue is gone. There is simply doing.
---Wayne Liquorman
Sunday, July 25, 2010
'subject and object' is a game of "Let's pretend."
Our real nature
can never be
asserted or denied.
---Jean Klein
can never be
asserted or denied.
---Jean Klein
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
Friday, July 16, 2010
Source-Inconceivable by Wei Wu Wei
WE ARE UNABLE TO CONCEIVE ANYTHING THAT DOES NOT 'LAST', including time itself. Conception, that which is conceived, is in total subjection to the concept of duration.
From this it follows that the act of conceiving must be outside time and that conception itself, therefore, is temporal.
What we are as 'conceiving' is thereby seen to be inconceivable, and inconceivability can be said to be a definition of This-which-we-are.
This-Here-Now, which is I, is inconceivable because it is intemporal and non-finite. 'Conceiving' cannot conceive 'conceiving', therefore since whatever is conceivable cannot be what we are, what is inconceivable must necessarily be the inconceivable that cannot conceive itself.
Therefore our very inability to conceive what we are may be apprehended as a direct expression of what-we-are, and perhaps the only one we can know.
From this it follows that the act of conceiving must be outside time and that conception itself, therefore, is temporal.
What we are as 'conceiving' is thereby seen to be inconceivable, and inconceivability can be said to be a definition of This-which-we-are.
This-Here-Now, which is I, is inconceivable because it is intemporal and non-finite. 'Conceiving' cannot conceive 'conceiving', therefore since whatever is conceivable cannot be what we are, what is inconceivable must necessarily be the inconceivable that cannot conceive itself.
Therefore our very inability to conceive what we are may be apprehended as a direct expression of what-we-are, and perhaps the only one we can know.
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
Concepts are merely the results, rendered permanent by language, of a previous process of comparison.---Sir W. Hamilton
Are you still bound
by concepts -
such as believing that
there is a world out there
with you in it?
by concepts -
such as believing that
there is a world out there
with you in it?
Sunday, July 11, 2010
think about it
You don't perceive
what's happening.
"You" are part of "what's happening"
perceiving itself.
what's happening.
"You" are part of "what's happening"
perceiving itself.
Saturday, July 3, 2010
an absolutely transparent moment
What we think of
as the present
is really made of the past.
The present is
an absolutely transparent moment
that only great saints
ever see,
occasionally.
---W.S. Merwin
as the present
is really made of the past.
The present is
an absolutely transparent moment
that only great saints
ever see,
occasionally.
---W.S. Merwin
Friday, July 2, 2010
"Know-ing" undivided into knower and known
Where perfect knowledge is,
there is nothing
(dualistically) existent.
---Lankavatara Sutra
there is nothing
(dualistically) existent.
---Lankavatara Sutra
Thursday, July 1, 2010
Noumenal Godhead has no separate bits.---Wei Wu Wei
How could "Totality" or "What IS"
be some thing
for some one
to refer to?
Who could stand
somewhere apart
even from
the smallest "part"?
be some thing
for some one
to refer to?
Who could stand
somewhere apart
even from
the smallest "part"?
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Sunday, June 27, 2010
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
echoes of Ramana
Because 'I', or 'Whole-Mind' - IS "All-Pervading",
'I' does not move.
'I' has no where to go to.
'I' does not move.
'I' has no where to go to.
Sunday, June 20, 2010
no "where" to go
You stand at the edge
Ready to throw yourself in.
What a shock to discover
There is nowhere to go
And no one to throw.
---Wayne Liquorman (Ram Tzu)
Ready to throw yourself in.
What a shock to discover
There is nowhere to go
And no one to throw.
---Wayne Liquorman (Ram Tzu)
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
objectivisation is the only obstacle
Phenomena are extended in 'space' and have duration in 'time',
without which they could not be perceived,
and without which there could be no perceiver:
both must 'last' in order that anything can be known at all.
Such is the essential characteristic of phenomenality,
whereas noumenality,
HAVING NO CHARACTERISTICS WHATEVER,
knows no such limitations.
---Wei Wu Wei
without which they could not be perceived,
and without which there could be no perceiver:
both must 'last' in order that anything can be known at all.
Such is the essential characteristic of phenomenality,
whereas noumenality,
HAVING NO CHARACTERISTICS WHATEVER,
knows no such limitations.
---Wei Wu Wei
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
genetic inheritance + subsequent conditioning = the "programming" of the body-mind apparatus
Can you find a place,
independent of the programming,
to operate from?
---Wayne Liquorman
independent of the programming,
to operate from?
---Wayne Liquorman
there is no PHENOMENAL way out
There's no place to stand
to remove yourself
from this conceptual existence.
---Wayne Liquorman
to remove yourself
from this conceptual existence.
---Wayne Liquorman
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
