Every "THING" that "we" perceive and conceive
CAN be disputed.
"THIS-NO-THING-NOW" can not.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(161)
-
▼
March
(18)
- "non-referentiality"
- "dualism"
- "what is, is"
- "Undifferentiated Being"
- absence of an entity to conceive either
- from The Education of Little Tree
- there IS no entity to suffer
- no place BUT home !
- no place to go
- a peek inside Ramana's "tool box" of pointers
- (and no one to come back)
- "apperceiving-mind is not divided"
- from Creativity and Taoism by Chang Chung-yuan
- "The ultimate truth is so simple."---Ramana Maharshi
- "direct-non volitional-apperceiving"
- THERE HAS NEVER BEEN AN OBJECTIVE "BEING"
- "voidness of apperceiving"
- harsh words ?
-
▼
March
(18)
As "I" see it, "THIS-NO-THING-NOW" can not be disputed because there is no one who could have an opinion. Thoughts arise in "this" but they are not originating from separate individuals.
ReplyDeleteHi Dianne, I certainly don't dispute what you're saying, but I think most people would say,"What do you mean there's no one to have an opinion?" On the other hand, who can dispute with(or doubt) what you say(including you), if you say nothing; if you don't attempt to characterize "this", or hold "it" fixed, in any way. Wayne Liquorman put it this way,"That SOMETHING is here, no one can dispute. I don't care WHAT you call it." Or as Wei Wu Wei wrote,"Any attempt to apprehend or express what-I-am, which is what-you-are, is closing an open door in order to pass through it.
ReplyDeleteI hope this makes it more clear what I was trying to get at with my post. Thanks again for your interest, Tom.