"We" don't have to look
In order to "see" that "this"
Is wherever "we" happen to be.
---Wei Wu Wei
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(161)
-
▼
March
(18)
- "non-referentiality"
- "dualism"
- "what is, is"
- "Undifferentiated Being"
- absence of an entity to conceive either
- from The Education of Little Tree
- there IS no entity to suffer
- no place BUT home !
- no place to go
- a peek inside Ramana's "tool box" of pointers
- (and no one to come back)
- "apperceiving-mind is not divided"
- from Creativity and Taoism by Chang Chung-yuan
- "The ultimate truth is so simple."---Ramana Maharshi
- "direct-non volitional-apperceiving"
- THERE HAS NEVER BEEN AN OBJECTIVE "BEING"
- "voidness of apperceiving"
- harsh words ?
-
▼
March
(18)
I like your post title "no place BUT home!" No matter where we are, we already are home. And we don't need to do anything to understand this, it just is what it is.
ReplyDeleteIt is nice to "see" "this" and no longer be stuck in that dreamworld of separation. I enjoy your posts, Tom. Sometimes I wish I knew how to talk about it better though.
Hi again Dianne, I'm glad you like that little bit of wit. I also find your comment(s) nicely thought out and expressed. Why, may I ask, do you wish you knew how to talk better about "this"?
ReplyDeleteHi, It's just that I don't have much experience discussing nonduality yet. It seems hard for me to phrase things in ways that make sense. But I enjoy trying.
ReplyDeleteIt does have it's challenges. Wayne Liquorman has called it,"talking about that which can't be talked about." He also has said that his words are not THE TRUTH, but pointers, conceptual tools of limited applicability.
ReplyDeleteI enjoy finding some slight modification, with the possibility of some fresh effect, in the fashioning of these "tools."