Wei Wu Wei tells us that no such "thing" as a "self" exists, or ever could exist.
Why?
Because it would require a second self to know the first!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(161)
-
▼
January
(14)
- from ch. 8 of "All Else Is Bondage"
- "there's no room (or time) for anything else"
- identity is a concept
- actual
- "You're seeing things."
- "knock, knock"
- "The Absolute"
- "spontaneous presence"
- Who wants to know?
- "Oneness"
- nothing to get... or lose
- Would you believe, "a conceptualized percept" ?
- from "Open Secret", chapter 70 (cont.)
- There's no there there.
-
▼
January
(14)
Is this a new format? Looks nice(r)
ReplyDeleteIt sounds to me as if this pointer could be extrapolated to include all; or every"thing" - if a starting point of "Not Two" is accepted.
Doesn't Shankara or a Gita or something say "the one without a second"?
In other words, no such thing as a discrete thing exists or could exist.
I'm guessing that you're liking this format more than the one for Untruths.(I do too.)
ReplyDeleteI think the uniqueness of this pointer is that I already sense that there's just one of me. This demonstrates that I cannot be an object, "a self."
I agree that as Liquorman said, "In Non-duality there isn't anything."