tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5350754803204402658.post7548207825918297272..comments2023-04-02T07:07:00.422-07:00Comments on Where can one stand?: "knock, knock"tom sullivanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05458625544046415716noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5350754803204402658.post-50521561335857108422010-01-26T22:27:51.942-08:002010-01-26T22:27:51.942-08:00I'm guessing that you're liking this forma...I'm guessing that you're liking this format more than the one for Untruths.(I do too.)<br />I think the uniqueness of this pointer is that I already sense that there's just one of me. This demonstrates that I cannot be an object, "a self."<br />I agree that as Liquorman said, "In Non-duality there isn't anything."tom sullivanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05458625544046415716noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5350754803204402658.post-53981441036812239852010-01-25T19:09:07.609-08:002010-01-25T19:09:07.609-08:00Is this a new format? Looks nice(r)
It sounds to...Is this a new format? Looks nice(r)<br /><br />It sounds to me as if this pointer could be extrapolated to include all; or every"thing" - if a starting point of "Not Two" is accepted. <br /><br />Doesn't Shankara or a Gita or something say "the one without a second"? <br /><br />In other words, no such thing as a discrete thing exists or could exist.DJHhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15060235915907812525noreply@blogger.com