Freedom from suffering simply means not being identified anymore, which means not being separate anymore. We only suffer when we're identified, and we're only identified when we're separate.
When we perceive directly, there is no separation. There is only perceiving.
---Jon Bernie
Saturday, July 31, 2010
no Wayne (or Fred) separate from the Whole
Q: Is Wayne, with a body-mind mechanism, aware that he is not the doer?
A: There is no longer a Wayne WITH a body-mind mechanism. There is only the body-mind mechanism with the name Wayne. There is no separate Wayne there to be aware that he (is or) is not the doer, or that the sense of personal doership is gone. The whole issue is gone. There is simply doing.
---Wayne Liquorman
A: There is no longer a Wayne WITH a body-mind mechanism. There is only the body-mind mechanism with the name Wayne. There is no separate Wayne there to be aware that he (is or) is not the doer, or that the sense of personal doership is gone. The whole issue is gone. There is simply doing.
---Wayne Liquorman
Sunday, July 25, 2010
'subject and object' is a game of "Let's pretend."
Our real nature
can never be
asserted or denied.
---Jean Klein
can never be
asserted or denied.
---Jean Klein
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
Friday, July 16, 2010
Source-Inconceivable by Wei Wu Wei
WE ARE UNABLE TO CONCEIVE ANYTHING THAT DOES NOT 'LAST', including time itself. Conception, that which is conceived, is in total subjection to the concept of duration.
From this it follows that the act of conceiving must be outside time and that conception itself, therefore, is temporal.
What we are as 'conceiving' is thereby seen to be inconceivable, and inconceivability can be said to be a definition of This-which-we-are.
This-Here-Now, which is I, is inconceivable because it is intemporal and non-finite. 'Conceiving' cannot conceive 'conceiving', therefore since whatever is conceivable cannot be what we are, what is inconceivable must necessarily be the inconceivable that cannot conceive itself.
Therefore our very inability to conceive what we are may be apprehended as a direct expression of what-we-are, and perhaps the only one we can know.
From this it follows that the act of conceiving must be outside time and that conception itself, therefore, is temporal.
What we are as 'conceiving' is thereby seen to be inconceivable, and inconceivability can be said to be a definition of This-which-we-are.
This-Here-Now, which is I, is inconceivable because it is intemporal and non-finite. 'Conceiving' cannot conceive 'conceiving', therefore since whatever is conceivable cannot be what we are, what is inconceivable must necessarily be the inconceivable that cannot conceive itself.
Therefore our very inability to conceive what we are may be apprehended as a direct expression of what-we-are, and perhaps the only one we can know.
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
Concepts are merely the results, rendered permanent by language, of a previous process of comparison.---Sir W. Hamilton
Are you still bound
by concepts -
such as believing that
there is a world out there
with you in it?
by concepts -
such as believing that
there is a world out there
with you in it?
Sunday, July 11, 2010
think about it
You don't perceive
what's happening.
"You" are part of "what's happening"
perceiving itself.
what's happening.
"You" are part of "what's happening"
perceiving itself.
Saturday, July 3, 2010
an absolutely transparent moment
What we think of
as the present
is really made of the past.
The present is
an absolutely transparent moment
that only great saints
ever see,
occasionally.
---W.S. Merwin
as the present
is really made of the past.
The present is
an absolutely transparent moment
that only great saints
ever see,
occasionally.
---W.S. Merwin
Friday, July 2, 2010
"Know-ing" undivided into knower and known
Where perfect knowledge is,
there is nothing
(dualistically) existent.
---Lankavatara Sutra
there is nothing
(dualistically) existent.
---Lankavatara Sutra
Thursday, July 1, 2010
Noumenal Godhead has no separate bits.---Wei Wu Wei
How could "Totality" or "What IS"
be some thing
for some one
to refer to?
Who could stand
somewhere apart
even from
the smallest "part"?
be some thing
for some one
to refer to?
Who could stand
somewhere apart
even from
the smallest "part"?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)